Archive for the ‘Government’ Category
Sneaky Stephen and the Conroy con.
Senator Minchin says that whatever the result of the tests, any national implementation will have to come under scrutiny from the Senate, where it would face some tough questions.
“At the very least, the Senate at least would have the opportunity to express a view on a disallowable instrument,” he said. “I think Senator Conroy should commit now to it being done legislatively, so the Parliament can have a say in this. He shouldn’t try to sneak it through the back door, through a regulation or other instrument. I think he should just come upfront and say if he’s going to do it, it being such a significant issue, it should be done by legislation to remove any doubt.”
A spokesman for Senator Conroy says the Minister is still looking into whether the filter would require legislation, or could be implemented through another means.
Adapted from ABC.
NoCleanFeed shirts sold to support the Leukaemia Foundation
Websinthe has put together anti-censorship shirts for the March in March with all profits going to the Leukaemia Foundation.
These shirts are a great way of supporting two causes at once and for once dispelling the idea that the anti-censorship lobby is doing nothing to protect children.
So if you’re planning on attending the March in March or are just looking to support two good causes at once, it might be time to whip out the credit card and place an order or two.
ACMA blocks political website
Investigations by Whirlpool community user xFoadx has found that political websites are anything but immune to the ACMA ban-hammer.
Anti-abortion advocacy website abortiontv.com was submitted to the ACMA by xFoadx as a phony complaint. Unfortunately, the ACMA fell for the deception and added the site to its blacklist.
Further information can be found at:
Australian Christian Lobby resorts to hypocrisy to promote the filter
Managing Director of the Australian Chrisitan Lobby Jim Wallace has written an article in the Sydney Morning Herald accusing the anti-censorship lobby, in particular the GetUp! foundation, of cherry picking statistics and misleading the public.
He then choose to fight this by cherry picking statistics and misleading the public.
Further information can be found at:
- Geordie Guy - Geordie Guy fires up about the blatant hypocrisy in Jim’s article
- Websinthe - Websinthe rebuts the article point-by-point
- Stilgherrian - Tears shreds out of the political childishness and lies in the article
- Letters to the SMH - Letters to the SMH show that readers truly disagree with Jim Wallace
Netspace survey shows Internet users do not want the ISP filter
Australian ISP Netspace has conducted a survey of nearly 10,000 of its customers asking questions about the government’s proposed filter.
The results were a statistical bombardment of the government’s claims that the Australian populace actually wants the filter.
Further information can be found at:
- Netspace - The survey results
- TechWiredAU
- Somebody Think Of The Children
*Links in order of post order
Web filter plan extends further
This page can be found here.
NEWS.com.au
December 22, 2008 04:55pm
In a post on his department’s blog, Senator Conroy today said technology that could filter data sent directly between computers would be tested as part of the upcoming live filtering trial.
“Technology that filters peer-to-peer and BitTorrent traffic does exist and it is anticipated that the effectiveness of this will be tested in the live pilot trial,” Senator Conroy said.
Peer-to-peer file-sharing technology is the most common way for computer users to share video, picture and music files over the internet.
It was previously thought the Government’s filtering plan would be restricted to traffic on the “world wide web” – the channel through which users view websites like news.com.au.
Senator Conroy revealed the plan to trial peer-to-peer filtering technology in a reply to critical comments made on the Digital Economy Future Directions blog launched earlier this month.
The blog was launched to encourage public input on the future of Australia’s digital economy, but has so far been saturated with comments attacking Senator Conroy over the Government’s filtering plan.
Senator Conroy addressed the level of critical feedback in his post and said he had been following discussion of the plan on social networking websites such as Twitter.
“I’m aware that this proposal has attracted significant debate and criticism – on this blog and at other places in the blogosphere,” Senator Conroy said.
“I’m following the debate at sites like Whirlpool and GetUp and on Twitter at #nocleanfeed.”
The filtering scheme has made headlines around the world in the The New York Times and British newspapers and was the target of protests held in major cities across the country earlier this month.
Live pilot trial
A live trial of filtering technology is scheduled to begin this week, but internet service providers have so far been kept in the dark over the details.
Less than a week before the trial was due to begin, participating ISPs Optus and iiNet said they had not been told if their applications had been accepted.
An Optus spokesperson today said the company had still not been notified of the status of its application.
“We still have not received notification about whether or not our proposal has been accepted, however our proposal does not include peer-to-peer filtering,” the spokesperson said.
Comment is being sought from iiNet.
‘Not like China’
Despite announcing the live pilot trial would likely include filtering peer-to-peer traffic, Senator Conroy rejected accusations that the scheme was similar to internet censorship in countries such as China.
“Freedom of speech is fundamentally important in a democratic society and there was never any suggestion that the Australian Government would seek to block political content,” Senator Conroy said.
“In this context, claims that the Government’s policy is analogous to the approach taken by countries such as Iran, China and Saudi Arabia are not justified.”
Senator Conroy said the internet filter would be in-step with existing methods to censor books, films and video games.
“Australian society has always accepted that there is some material which is not acceptable, particularly for children,” he said.
“That is why we have the National Classification Scheme for classifying films, computer games, publications and online content.”
“Australian ISPs are already subject to regulation that prohibits the hosting of certain material based upon the Scheme.
“All the Government is now seeking to do is to examine how technology can assist in filtering internationally-hosted content.”
Links
Senator Conroy’s blog post – http://www.dbcde.gov.au/communications_for_busines…
Internet Service Provider (ISP) Content Filtering ‘Live’ Pilot
This page can be found here.
In May 2008 the Australian Government committed $125.8 million over four years to support a comprehensive range of cyber-safety measures, including law enforcement, education and an informed and considered approach to ISP level filtering.
The Government intends to take an evidence-based approach to content filtering at the ISP level and is committed to working closely with industry to address any concerns, including costs and impacts on internet speeds.
These concerns will be carefully considered during a ‘live’ pilot of ISP filtering which will test a range of content filtering solutions in a real world environment, with the cooperation of ISPs (including mobile telephone operators) and their customers. The outcomes of the pilot will inform the Government’s decision making on the ISP filtering framework.
Why should ISPs participate?
The participation of industry is crucial to providing evidence on the real world impacts for ISP content filtering, including on ISPs and their customers.
Participation in the pilot provides ISPs with an invaluable opportunity to inform the Government’s approach to ISP filtering.
The ‘live’ pilot
Expressions of Interest are now being called from ISPs interested in participating in this ‘live’ pilot. Participation is restricted to those ISPs that provide a service to persons resident in Australia.
The pilot is expected to commence before the end of the year, although ISPs will be able to start later (but preferably before 24 December 2008).
Ideally, ISPs will participate in the pilot for a minimum of 6 weeks. ISPs that commence earlier will have the discretion to participate in the pilot until its conclusion.
Applications
ISPs are encouraged to read the Expression of Interest documents fully before completing an application—the following documents can be downloaded directly from this page.
Request for Expression of Interest (File format: PDF, File size: 93Kb)
Request for Expression of Interest (File format: RTF, File size: 2.6Mb)
Technical Testing Framework (File format: PDF, File size: 66Kb)
Technical Testing Framework (File format: RTF, File size: 2.4Mb)
Draft Deed of Agreement (File format: PDF, File size: 175Kb)
Draft Deed of Agreement (File format: RTF, File size: 2.7Mb)
Application Form (File format: PDF, File size: 85Kb)
Application Form (File format: RTF, File size: 2.6Mb)
Applications are due by Monday 8 December 2008.
Enquiries
Further details about the ‘live’ pilot can be obtained by submitting specific questions or issues for clarification to the Department’s mailbox—ISPPilot@dbcde.gov.au—preferably before 5pm on Tuesday 18 November 2008.
For specific questions submitted by this date, a list of questions (source unidentified) and responses will be posted on this web page by Tuesday 25 November 2008 for general reference.
You are currently browsing the archives for the Government category.